Quantcast The Daily Barometer
College Media Network

Have any interesting tidbits on history of sex?

Abstract:


Dr. Sex,

I have read your column each week for the past four years. A bunch of my friends were sitting around talking about your articles and we were saying that each week we hear the same thing. It is always masturbation is good, find the clitoris and G-spot, and there is a huge range of penis size! I have some suggestions of new topics....

  • Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

John D Perry PhD

posted 10/28/09 @ 3:33 PM PST

It is amazing how many educated people don't bother to learn the latest scientific developments in the field of sexology. Good Job!

Garrett

posted 10/29/09 @ 7:34 PM PST

I'm almost tempted not to comment on this article, because I wish not to give any credibility to this type of opinion piece. And yes, these tidbits on sexual history is wrought with opinion, just as the lectures given by Greaves are.

It is sad to see how holding sex as sacred has become viewed as ignorant in favor of reckless sexual liberation.

These articles might be entertaining, but they are to many people far more offensive than Nathaniel Blake's articles were several years ago. Yet the Barometer, instead of trying to be more professional, installs Greaves writing articles as pornographic as those in Hustler Magazine. The ridicule that comes from Greaves's side of the fence though is enough to prevent the cowards who are offended by her to speak out.

I know I am not the only one that believes that Greaves's pansexuality is neither healthy nor morally sound.

I urge the Barometer to be more responsible and replace these trashy articles with those that might serve a broader audience. Not all of us in the student body and alumni community are interested in this type of pornographic reading material. Not everyone is overly sexually active, nor are the views of Greaves accepted as sound by everyone.

As a twice-graduated OSU Alum that continues to read the Barometer, I demand this change.

Eric Hill

posted 10/30/09 @ 4:09 PM PST

Originally posted by

Garrett

I'm almost tempted not to comment on this article, because I wish not to give any credibility to this type of opinion piece. And yes, these tidbits on sexual history is wrought with opinion, just as the lectures given by Greaves are.

It is sad to see how holding sex as sacred has become viewed as ignorant in favor of reckless sexual liberation.

These articles might be entertaining, but they are to many people far more offensive than Nathaniel Blake's articles were several years ago. Yet the Barometer, instead of trying to be more professional, installs Greaves writing articles as pornographic as those in Hustler Magazine. The ridicule that comes from Greaves's side of the fence though is enough to prevent the cowards who are offended by her to speak out.

I know I am not the only one that believes that Greaves's pansexuality is neither healthy nor morally sound.

I urge the Barometer to be more responsible and replace these trashy articles with those that might serve a broader audience. Not all of us in the student body and alumni community are interested in this type of pornographic reading material. Not everyone is overly sexually active, nor are the views of Greaves accepted as sound by everyone.

As a twice-graduated OSU Alum that continues to read the Barometer, I demand this change.


I had no idea Victorianism had made such a powerful comeback. Was it the latest fin de siècle that did it?
  • Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Advertisement